Reactive cationic resins for use as dry and wet strength agents in sulfite ion-containing papermaking systems

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to resins useful for drainage in papermaking and the process of making paper using the resins. In particular the invention relates to glyoxalated copolymers of acrylamide containing significant amounts of cationic comonomer.

This application is a continuation of and claims benefit of U.S.application Ser. No. 11/304,345, filed Dec. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No.7,828,934, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser.No. 60/637,848 filed on Dec. 21, 2004, the contents of which are herebyincorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to glyoxalated copolymers of acrylamidecontaining significant amounts of cationic comonomer and their use inpapermaking operations. These resins, when added as a wet-end paperchemicals, provide wet and dry strength in paper making systems whichcontain sulfite ion. Also, the resins were found to provide drainagebenefits in recycled linerboard.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Certain papermaking systems contain paper pulps bleached or brightenedusing sodium dithionite, also known as sodium hydrosulfite. Theresultant bleached or brightened pulps or mechanical fibers are commonlyused in the newsprint and publication grade market segment as well asother paper market segments. These pulps or mechanical fibers cancontain significant levels of sulfite residuals in the papermaking wetend which presents a challenge to the papermaking process. Other sourcesof sulfite include shared white water systems and deliberate addition ofsulfite to eliminate traces of chlorine. One problem associated withelevated sulfite levels is that synthetic strength resins based uponglyoxalated poly (acrylamide) have limited effectiveness due to theaction of sulfite ion on the resin decreases or eliminates itseffectiveness.

In commercial practice, glyoxalated poly (acrylate) resins are preparedby reacting glyoxal with a copolymer of acrylamide and a small amount ofcationic comonomer, typically diallyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC),to obtain mildly cationic resins. Such resins are described in U.S. Pat.Nos. 3,556,933, 4,605,702 and 5,723,022, the disclosures of which areincorporated herein by reference.

It is well known that glyoxalated resins lose their effectiveness toimpart strength to paper in sulfite-containing environments. Sulfiteions are reactive towards the gem-hydroxyl functionalities present inthese resins

This problem is recognized in the papermaking art, and was clearly setforth by C. E. Farley in a TAPPI Monograph on Wet Strength Resins andtheir Application (L.L. Chan, editor, 1994, ISBN 0-89852-060-6, Chapter3 “Glyoxalated polyacrylamide resin”). The following quote is believedto represent the generally accepted opinion of the effect of sulfite onglyoxalated polyacrylamide resins:

-   -   “The resin reacts with sulfite and bisulfite ions present in the        paper machine wet end. The anionic bisulfite adduct which forms        can offset a portion or all of the cationic charge on the resin,        and efficiency is lost due to reduced resin retention in the        paper. The presence of sulfites in the paper machine wet end is        due to either bleaching (hydrosulfite) carryover or addition of        antichlor. Where sulfite levels are controlled at about 2 ppm or        less, glyoxalated PAM efficiency is not affected.”

In order to solve the problem of sulfites' deleterious effect onstrength resins, oxidants have been added to the paper machine wet end,or highly cationic resins have been added to complex with the nowanionic glyoxalated polyacrylamide.

Glyoxalated poly(acrylamide)s and variants thereof have been disclosedin a number of US and other patents.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932 teaches the use of water soluble, ionicglyoxalated vinylamide wet strength resins and paper made therewith.Specifically, U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932 teaches the use of cationicvinylamide polymers and copolymers of acrylamide anddiallyldimethylammonium chloride in 99:1 to 75:25 ratio. U.S. Pat. No.3,556,933 teaches the use of sulfite ion to enhance the storagestability of the resins of U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932, and regeneration ofsuch resins using formaldehyde.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,603,176 teaches the use of glyoxalated terpolymerscontaining a polar non-nucleophilic unit, which does not cause the resinto become water insoluble, as temporary wet strength agent. A cationicfragment is also included in the compositions taught. U.S. Pat. No.4,605,702 teaches the use of low molecular weight polymers as a basisfor temporary wet strength resins. Specifically, U.S. Pat. No. 4,605,702teaches the use of 1-30 by weight % of a cationic comonomer or mixtureof cationic comonomers copolymerizable with acrylamide. U.S. Pat. No.4,954,538 teaches the use of microparticles consisting of glyoxalatedacrylamide containing polymeric material as wet- and dry strength agentsfor use in paper production. U.S. Pat. No. 5,723,022 teachescompositions of blends of compositions of U.S. Pat. No. 3,566,932 andU.S. Pat. No. 4,605,702.

The need exists for resins for imparting strength to paper which arerelatively resistant to the level of sulfite ions present in thepapermaking process.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a reactive cationic resin comprising acopolymer produced from a comonomer which is dialdehyde reactive, acationic comonomer and a dialdehyde wherein the cationic comonomer isselected from the group consisting of diallyldimethylammonium chloride(DADMAC), 2-vinylpyridine, 4-vinylpyridine, 2-vinyl-N-methylpyridiniumchloride, 2-(acryloyloxyethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride,2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate, 3-acrylamidopropyl-trimethylammoniumchloride, dimethylaminopropyl acrylamide, andtrimethyl(p-vinylbenzyl)ammonium chloride and wherein the cationiccomonomer comprises greater than 10 mole % of the copolymer beforereaction with dialdehyde.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 depicts the gelation stability, as determined by changes inviscosity over time, of a reactive cationic resin according to Example 2relative to a comparative commercial resin.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a resin, its synthesis and its use inwet-strength and/or dry-strength applications. The resins of the presentinvention are of particular use in papermaking systems were there areelevated amounts of sulfite ions present.

The present invention relates to copolymers of dialdehyde-reactivecomonomers, preferably acrylamide, which contain a significant amount ofcationic comonomer which has been reacted with a dialdehyde, preferablyglyoxal to produce a resin. These resins, in the form of aqueoussolutions, are useful in papermaking systems containing sulfite ions.

As defined herein, the term “comonomer” includes materials of highermolecular weights such as oligomers, as well as monomeric materials.

A comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactive of use in the formation of thereactive cationic resins of the invention may be any comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive which is capable of reacting through radical chainpolymerization with a cationic comonomer to form a dialdehyde-reactivecopolymer. Preferably, the comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactiveselected from the group consisting of acrylamide, methacrylamide,N-methyl acrylamide, and N-methyl methacrylamide. Most preferably, thecomonomer which is dialdehyde-reactive is acrylamide or methacrylamide.

A cationic comonomer of use in the formation of the reactive cationicresins of the invention may be any cationic monomer which is capable ofreacting through radical chain polymerization with the comonomer whichis dialdehyde-reactive to form a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer. Cationicmonomers include tertiary and quaternary diallyl amino derivatives, ortertiary and quaternary amino derivatives of acrylic acid or(meth)acrylicacid or acrylamide or (meth)acrylamide, vinylpyridines andquaternary vinylpyridines, or para-styrene derivatives containingtertiary or quaternary aminoderivatives.

The cationic comonomers may be a member selected from the groupconsisting of diallyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC),[2-(acrylamido)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[2-(methacrylamido)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[3-(acrylamido)propyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[3-(methacrylamido)propyl]trimethylammonium chloride,N-methyl-2-vinylpyridinium N-methyl-4-vinylpyridinium,p-vinylphenyltrimethylammonium chloride, p-vinylbenzyltrimethyammoniumchloride, [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[3-(acryloyloxy)propyl]trimethylammonium chloride,[3-(methacryloyloxy)propyl]trimethylammonium chloride

It is understood that mixtures of cationic comonomers can be used to thesame purpose. It is preferred that the cationic comonomers are notreactive towards dialdehyde under basic conditions, e.g., greater thanpH 7.

A preferred cationic comonomer is diallyldimethylammonium chloride(DADMAC).

The reactive cationic resin may include structures in which dialdehydeunits have reacted with comonomer which contain aldehyde functionalityto form one or more crosslinks. This reaction is used to increase themolecular weight of the reactive cationic resin.

The reactive cationic resins exhibit charge densities of greater than1.0 meq/g as determined by the method set forth hereinbelow. Preferably,the reactive cationic resins exhibit charge densities of greater than1.5 meq/g, more preferably greater than 2.5 meq/g.

These reactive cationic resins are most conveniently made in two steps.

In the first step, the comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactive and thecationic comonomer are copolymerized in the desired ratio to a usefulmolecular weight. In the second step, the resulting copolymer is reactedwith dialdehyde, preferably glyoxal, to produce the reactive cationicresin.

The molecular weight of the copolymer must be such that it can bereadily crosslinked to a high molecular weight resin, which is stableagainst gelation for some period of time and has a solids content to beof commercial value. Copolymers having a reduced specific viscosity ofat least about 0.1 dL/g, preferably in the range of between about 0.1 toabout 0.5 dL/g, are considered to have a sufficient molecular weight tobe of use in the resins of the present invention.

Herein, molecular weight may be expressed in terms of a material'sreduced specific viscosity (“RSV”) of 2% of a material in 1M aqueousNH₄Cl at 25° C.

The material's RSV was determined using the following method. RSV of a2% solution of the material in 1M aqueous NH₄Cl is determined at 25° C.by means of a Ubbelohde viscometer and a Brinkmann Viscotimer. Flowtimes of the 2% material solution and the pure solvent are measured andthe relative viscosity (Nrel) calculated. The reduced specific viscosityis calculated from the relative viscosity. This method is based on ASTMD446.

Apparatus

-   -   1. Ubbelohde Viscometer tubes, No. 1, with Viscometer Constant        C=0.01—available from Visco Systems, Yonkers, N.Y., or Schott,        Hofheim, Germany, or Brinkmann instruments.    -   2. Brinkmann Viscotimer C—available from Brinkmann Instruments        Inc., Cantiague Rd., Westbury, N.Y. 11590.    -   3. Ubbelohde Viscometer Support—ibid., Cat. No. 21-00-032-9.    -   4. Constant temperature water bath maintained at 25+/−0.1° C.

Cooling capability (cold water or ice pack) may be necessary to maintainconstant temperature. An ASTM 45C thermometer should be used to monitorthe temperature near the viscometer tube mounting location.

-   -   (1) Volumetric flask, 50 mL, Class A.    -   (2) Beaker, 10 mL.    -   (3) ASTM 45C thermometer, calibrated, designed for measurements        at 25° C. with 0.05 degree divisions—available from VWR        Scientific, Cat. No. 61118-923, or equivalent.    -   (4) Source of vacuum—Preferably a water aspirator for cleaning        of viscometers.    -   (5) Filter or stainless steel screen, ca. 100 mesh.

Reagents

-   -   1. Ammonium chloride, granular. ACS reagent grade.    -   2. Solvent (1M NH₄Cl). Add 53.5+/−0.1 g of NH₄Cl to a 1-liter        volumetric flask, dilute to volume with distilled water and mix.

Preferably, the reactive cationic resins of the present invention have asolids content of at least about 20% by weight, more preferably in therange of between about 20% to about 50% by weight.

In order for the reaction between the copolymer and the dialdehyde toproceed in a controlled way, it is advantageous if the copolymers usedin this invention have a limited polydispersity, preferably between 2and 4.

Initiating Systems

Copolymerization of comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactive and acationic comonomer is carried out by a radical polymerization in anaqueous solution using a redox initiating system such as a combinationof sodium metabisulfite and sodium persulfate to provide relatively lowand controlled molecular weight copolymers having low residual monomers.Many other combination of redox initiating systems are useful ininitiating polymerization of the comonomers to form copolymers used toform the resins of the present invention, including other persulfatesalts such as potassium persulfate or ammonium persulfate or othercomponents such as potassium bromate. Some of these redox initiatingsystems may be used as single component initiators, typically incombination with a chain transfer agent, such as a combination ofammonium persulfate and sodium hypophosphite or sodium persulfate andisopropanol. Other, thermally activated, water-soluble initiators can beused as well, such as using2,2′-azobis-(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride,4,4′-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) and2,2′-azobis-[2-(-imidazolin-2-yl)propane]dihydrochloride. These can beused alone or in combination with chain transfer agents such asmercaptoethanol or mercaptopropionic acid or others.

Reaction Conditions for Copolymer Manufacture

Polymerization is typically carried out in an aqueous solution at atemperature of at least about 50° C., preferably at a temperaturebetween about 50 and about 100° C., more preferably between about 60 andabout 80° C., Isopropanol can be used as a cosolvent to provideefficient heat transfer by reflux as well as functioning as a chaintransfer agent. It is sometimes advantageous to raise the temperatureafter the addition of all comonomers has been completed, to reduce thelevel of monomers in the product. The pH during the reaction isdepending on the initiator used and may be set with a buffer.

Comonomers maybe added at once or added over any length of time. If thecationic comonomer is less reactive than comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, it may be advantageous to add part or all of thecationic comonomer initially, followed by a slow or batchwise additionof comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactive and redox initiator system andchain transfer agent. Like wise, initiators maybe added at once or addedover any length of time. To reduce the amount of residual monomer in thecopolymer, is often advantageous to continue adding the initiator systemfor some time after all comonomer has been added, or to introducebatchwise additional amounts of initiator.

The amount of the cationic comonomer which is to needed to form thereactive cationic resins of the present invention is greater than 10mole % of the dialdehyde-reactive copolymer before reaction withdialdehyde. Preferably the amount of cationic comonomer which is toneeded to form the reactive cationic resins of the present invention isgreater than about 25 mole % of the dialdehyde-reactive copolymer beforereaction with dialdehyde, more preferably greater than about 30 mole %,more preferably greater than about 40 mole %, still more preferably inthe range of from about 25 mole % to about 90 mole %, still morepreferably in the range of from about 25 mole % to about 40 mole %,still more preferably in the range of from about 30 mole % to about 40mole %.

Reaction Conditions for Resin Manufacture

To generate the reactive cationic resins of the present invention, thecopolymers prepared by reacting comonomer which is dialdehyde-reactivewith a cationic comonomer, are in turn reacted with a dialdehyde.Preferred dialdehydes for reaction with the copolymer are glyoxal and C₁to about C₈ saturated or unsaturated alkylene or phenylene dialdehydes.Examples of such dialdehydes include malonic dialdehyde, succinicdialdehyde, glutaraldehyde, adipic dialdehyde, 2-hydroxyadipicdialdehyde, pimelic dialdehyde, suberic dialdehyde, azelaic dialdehyde,sebacic dialdehyde, maleic aldehyde, fumaric aldehyde, phthalaldehyde,isophthalaldehyde, terephthalaldehyde, and 1,4-diformylcyclohexane. Themost preferred dialdehyde is glyoxal.

This reaction is carried out at a total solids level of 5-25% preferable8-20%, most preferably between 10 and 16%.

Dialdehyde is added in 1 to 85 weight % relative to the comonomer whichis dialdehyde-reactive fraction in the polymer, preferably dialdehyde isadded in 15 to 45 weight percent relative to the comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive content in the polymer. This reaction is typicallycarried under mild basic to neutral conditions, preferably between pH7.5 and 10. Dialdehyde may be added at once or over any length of time.The reaction is typically carried out between about 15 and about 40° C.,preferably between about 18 and about 25° C. The reaction can be carriedout at the final dilution of the product, or can be diluted continuouslyor in steps during the reaction.

At some point in time during the reaction, the viscosity of the reactionmixture of copolymer and dialdehyde will start to increase. Typically,further progression of the reaction is stopped or greatly reduced byacidification of the reaction mixture to a pH of 5 or below, preferablya pH in the range of about 2 to 5, preferably a pH in the range of about2.5 to 4, at some desired viscosity.

Charge density of the reactive cationic resins of the present inventionmay can be determined based on the known structure of the resin bycalculating as follows: charge density (meq/g)=1000/molecular weight percharge.

To measure the charge density of the reactive cationic resins of thepresent invention, the following method is used.

Charge Density

This method is used for determining the charge density of materials at apH of 8.0. A colloid titration is used. Charge density is the amount ofcationic charge per unit weight, in milliequivalents per gram of productsolids.

The sample is titrated with potassium polyvinyl sulfate (PVSK or KPVS)or polyethylene sodium sulfonate (PES-Na) to a 0 mV potential. A Mütekparticle charge detector, or its equivalent, is used for end pointdetection. The charge density is calculated from the titration results,on a dry solids basis. A total solids measurement on the sample isrequired for this determination.

Apparatus

(1) Mütek particle charge detector, Model PCD 03, with measuring celland piston—available from BTG/Muetek Analytic Inc., 2815 Colonnades Ct.,Norcross, Ga., or BTG/Mütek Analytic GmbH, Herrsching, Germany.

(2) Teflon splash ring

(3) Autotitrator, Brinkmann Titrino 794, 798, 716 DMS, or equivalent,with printer or PC and titration software. Use a fixed titration rate(MET U mode, 0.1 mL/dose, 5 sec. equilibrium time).

(4) Titrator delivery tip—Anti-diff buret tip 6.1543.200, ibid, Cat. No.020-68-324-4.

(5) Adapter cable, to connect Mütek with titrator—available from Muetekor Brinkmann (Brinkmann Cat. No. 20 97 739-6 for Titrino 716, Cat. No.20-97-768-0 for Titrino 794).

(6) Pipet or volumetric dispenser, 10 mL.

(7) Volumetric digital pipet, EDP-Plus Pipette, 2.5 mL—available fromRainin Instrument Co., Woburn, Mass., Cat. No. EP-2500, or glass pipet,2.00 mL, Class A.

(8) Volumetric flask, 2-L.

Reagents

(1) Anionic titrant solution, 0.500 mN—

(a) Potassium polyvinyl sulfate (PVSK) titrant solution, 0.500mN—prepare by diluting 0.001N PVSK (BTG/Muetek No. 811-10216) toone-half the supplied concentration; or

(b) Polyethylene sodium sulfonate (PES-Na) titrant solution, 0.500mN—prepare by diluting 0.001N PES-Na to one-half the suppliedconcentration; or, using dry powder PES-Na, prepare by weighing, to thenearest 0.0001 g, 0.064 g of dry powder PES-Na into a 100 mL beaker.Rinse the sides of the beaker, add approximately 50 mL of distilledwater, and stir until the powder is completely dissolved. Quantitativelytransfer this solution to a 1-L volumetric flask and dilute to the markwith distilled water. Mix well. Calculate the exact normality of thissolution using Equation (1).

The anionic titrant solution is a primary standard and need not bestandardized

(2) Sodium phosphate, monobasic (NaH₂PO₄.H₂O), reagent grade,

(3) Sodium phosphate, dibasic (Na₂HPO₄), reagent grade.

(4) Monobasic sodium phosphate stock solution—Prepare a 0.01M solutionby weighing 1.38 g of monobasic sodium phosphate into a 1-L volumetricflask. Dilute to volume with distilled water and mix well.

(5) Dibasic sodium phosphate stock solution—Prepare a 0.05M solution byweighing 7.10 g of dibasic sodium phosphate into a 1-L volumetric flask.Dilute to volume with distilled water and mix well.

(6) Phosphate buffer solution, 0.01 M, pH 8.0—Pipet 72.5 mL of the 0.01Mmonobasic solution into a 2-liter beaker and add about 600 mL ofdistilled water. Add 0.05M dibasic sodium phosphate until a pH of 8.0 isreached (ca. 186 mL, depending upon the pH of the distilled water).Dilute to 1 L with distilled water. Check the pH of this buffer solutionperiodically and readjust as needed.

(7) Acetone

(8) Sodium Bromide (NaBr)—available from VWR Scientific, Cat. No.EM-SX0390-1, or equivalent.

Procedure

Charge Measurement:

(1) Determine percent total solids of the resin sample, using theappropriate total solids method.

(2) Calculate the amount of resin required, to prepare a 0.125% samplesolution, using the percent total solids (TS) of the sample and Equation2.

(3) Weigh the calculated amount of well mixed sample into a 100 mLvolumetric flask. Record the weight to the nearest 0.0001 g.

(4) Add approximately 75 mL of distilled water and mix well.

(5) Dilute to the mark with distilled water and mix thoroughly.

(6) Pipet 2.00 mL of the sample solution into the Mütek measuring cell,then pipet or dispense 8.0 mL of pH 8 buffer solution into the cell.Gently insert the piston, with the piston ring (positioned midway), intothe measuring cell.

(7) Slide the measuring cell along the Mütek guide all the way to therear. The electrode should face toward the rear.

(8) Pull the piston upward, in the proper orientation, and twist to lockit in the instrument.

(9) Discharge a portion of titrant to waste, then insert the titratortubing tip into the measuring cell. Make sure the tip is touching thesolution and away from the piston.

(10) Allow the mV reading to stabilize, then titrate with the anionictitrant at a specified, constant titration rate (0.1 mL/dose, 5 sec.equilibration; or 0.85 mL./min.) to a fixed end point of 0 mV potential.Duplicate charge density titrations are recommended. If the initial mVreading does not stabilize, the measuring cell may be dirty.

(11) If the charge density is not displayed by the titrator, record thevolume of titrant used, and calculate the charge density using Equation3. Average duplicate results.

Calculations(Wp×0.5)/Wd=N  Eq (1)where:

-   Wp=weight of dry powder PES-Na diluted to 2 L, g-   Wd=desired weight of dry powder PES-Na per Mütek instructions, 0.128    g, for 1 L of 1 mN solution-   N=concentration of the PES-Na titrant (approx. 0.500 mN)-   0.5=desired normality.    ((0.125 g)/TS)×100%=Weight of Sample  Eq(2)    where:

TS=total solids of the sample, %

0.125=desired weight of resin solids(S×N×10)/(W×TS×Vs)=Charge density, meq/g  Eq (3)where:S=sample titration volume, mLN=concentration of the anionic titrant, 0.500 mNW=weight of sample used in preparing the sample solution, ˜1 gTS=total solids of the sample, %10=100×100/1000, sample dilution×TS unit conversion/L to mL conversionVs=volume of diluted sample solution, 2.00 mL.Report

Report the charge density to the nearest 0.01 meq/g.

Papermaking Systems

These resins are added as a wet-end paper chemicals in papermakingsystems. Preferably these resins are added at a point where the fibersare still relatively concentrated (“thick stock”). Addition levels wherethe resins of the current invention provide economical benefits to thepapermaker are in the range of from about 0.05 to about 1% relative todry fiber weight range, preferably in about 0.1 to about 0.5% range. ThepH of the papermaking slurry is preferably between about 4 and about8.5, preferably between about 5 and about 7.5.

The resins made according to present invention are of utility whenapplied in sulfite containing papermaking systems. Such papermakingsystems are typically producing paper at least partly based on bleachedor brightened fibers obtained by mechanical means. Such paper istypically produced for the publication grade market segment, andincludes newsprint and light weight coated paper. It is understood thatin many cases mixtures of mechanically and (semi) chemically orotherwise obtained fibers may be used in papermaking systems in whichthe resins of the current invention can be advantageously applied. It isalso understood that the resins can be of use when applied innon-mechanical paper grades, such as papers based on bleached- orunbleached-, hardwood- or softwood-fiber or on secondary fiber, such asrecycled fiber or deinked pulps. The sulfite level in the papermakingslurry can encompass a wide range from about 0 to about 700 ppm ofsulfite without affecting the efficiency of the reactive cationic resinsof the current invention. “High sulfite conditions” is defined herein asa sulfite level found in a papermaking slurry greater than 20 ppm.Reactive cationic resins of the present invention efficiently impartstrength to paper even under high sulfite conditions. The reactivecationic resins of the present invention may be added to papermakingslurries when sulfite is present in the range of greater than about 20ppm to about 250 ppm, more preferably in the range from about 50 ppm toabout 200 ppm.

Finally, while there are particular benefits associated with the use ofresins according to the present invention in the presence of sulfite, itis understood that these resins may be applied in papermaking systemswhich are not under high sulfite conditions and still provide benefitsover conventional glyoxalated resins in specific cases or for specificpurposes. For example, the use of resins according to the presentinvention may have utility when applied in papermaking systems whichhave a conductivity of greater than 1.5 mS/cm. The conductivity may bedetermined by testing methods known in the art, such TAPPI Test Method:T252, “pH and electrical conductivity of hot water extracts of pulp,paper, and paperboard”, for example.

Combination with (Bio)Polymers and/or Other Resins

The resins of the current invention can be added alone to providestrength benefits, or in combination with conventional paper makingstrength additives. These additives include cellulose derivatives, suchas carboxymethyl cellulose, cationic-, anionic-, amphoteric-, anduncharged starches and cationic, anionic, amphoteric, and unchargedsynthetic polymers, such poly(acrylamide) and copolymers, and reactionproducts of these with epichlorohydrin, poly(ethyleneimine)s, poly(vinylalcohol)s, poly(N-vinylformamide)s, poly(vinylamine)s and reactionproducts of poly(amidoamines) with epichlorohydrin. Also these resinsprovide strength benefits in the presence of other glyoxalated resins,such as glyoxalated cationic, anionic, amphoteric, and unchargedpoly(acrylamides). In particular, combinations with starch and/orcopolymers of acrylic acid and acrylamide or glyoxalated copolymers ofacrylic acid and acrylamide are beneficial.

Other ingredients can be used in conjunction with the resins of thisinvention. The additives or ingredients commonly used in papermaking canbe used here also as for example alum, rosin size, coating colors,mineral fillers, starch, casein, etc. The presence of other ingredientsis not essential to this invention and excellent results are achievedwhen using only the resins of this invention.

Generally, the process of manufacturing paper comprises three principalsteps: (1) forming an aqueous suspension of cellulosic fibers; (2)adding a strengthening additive, such as a wet-strength and ordry-strength resin; (3) sheeting and drying the fibers to form a desiredcellulosic web.

The first step of forming an aqueous suspension of cellulosic fibers isperformed by conventional means, such as known mechanical, chemical andsemichemical, etc., pulping processes. After mechanical grinding and/orchemical pulping step, the pulp is washed to remove residual pulpingchemicals and solubilized wood components. These steps are well known,as described in, e.g., Casey, Pulp and Paper (New York, IntersciencePublishers, Inc. 1952).

The second step may be carried out by adding the strengthening additivedirectly to the papermaking system. Individual components and blends ofcomponents may be in a dry form or they may be in aqueous systems.

The third step of sheeting and drying the fibers to form a cellulosicweb may be carried out according to conventional means, such as thosedescribed in e.g., Casey, Pulp and Paper (New York, IntersciencePublishers, Inc. 1952).

The reactive cationic resins of the present invention can be added tothe papermaking process at any point in the process where strengthresins are presently added, and preferably the resins are added to thepaper as aqueous solution. The resins of the invention can be added atany time before, during or after the paper is formed. For example, theresin can be added before or after the refining of the pulp, at the fanpump or head box, or by spraying on the wet web. The resin can also beadded to preformed paper by tub sizing or spraying on the dried papersheets. In most commercial papermaking, it is preferred to add the resinat the fan pump or head box in the form of an aqueous solution. Variousamounts of resin can be used. The actual amount of resin used in thepaper can be easily determined by one skilled in the art.

The following examples will serve to illustrate the invention, parts andpercentages being by weight unless otherwise indicated.

EXAMPLES Example 1

a. Synthesis of dialdehyde-reactive copolymers useful in the productionof reactive cationic resins.

b. This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymerin which a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 30 mole % DADMAC.

c. In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostaticbath, with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperatureprobe, nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected tofour dosing pumps 68 grams of DADMAC (65% aqueous solution, Aldrich) and316 grams of demi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour.Initiators solution of 2.6 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 52 grams ofwater and 0.3 grams of SPDS in 54 grams of water were prepared. Bothsolutions were purged for 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

d. After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 65° C. undergentle stirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 65° C. theinitiator feed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.4 grams/minute,271.3 grams of acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in120 minutes (dosing rate of 2.3 g/min) and 135.6 grams of DADMACsolution were dosed in 80 minutes (dosing rate of 1.7 g/min). Thereactor was kept at 65° C. during the dosing period. After the dosingperiod the reactor was heated to 80° C. and the initiators were fed foranother 20 minutes. The reactor was kept at 80° C. for a total of onehour. Reaction product was cooled and stored at ambient temperature andsolids were found at 33.4%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2%solution in 1 N NH₄Cl and found to be 0.24 dL/g.

Example 2

This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer inwhich a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 30 mole % DADMAC.

In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostatic bath,with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperature probe,nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected to threedosing pumps 203 grams of DADMAC (65% aqueous solution, Aldrich) and 316grams of demi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour. Initiatorssolution of 2.6 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 52 grams of water and0.3 grams of SPDS in 54 grams of water were prepared. Both solutionswere purged for 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 65° C. under gentlestirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 65° C. the initiatorfeed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.4 grams/minute, 271.3grams of acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in 120minutes (dosing rate of 2.3 g/min. The reactor was kept at 65° C. duringthe dosing period. After the dosing period the reactor was heated to 80°C. and the initiators were fed for another 30 minutes. Reaction productwas cooled and stored at ambient temperature and solids were found at31.5%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2% solution in 1 N NH₄Cland found to be 0.26 dL/g.

Example 3

This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer inwhich a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 30 mole % DADMAC, and wherein theresultant copolymer contains a low level of residual monomer.

In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostatic bath,with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperature probe,nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected to threedosing pumps, 136.7 grams of DADMAC (65% aqueous solution, Aldrich) and195.8 grams of demi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour.Initiator solution of 4.92 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 46.2 gramsof water and 1.32 grams of SPDS in 49.8 grams of water were prepared.Both solutions were purged for 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 75° C. under gentlestirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 75° C. the initiatorfeed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.18 grams/minute, 182.3grams of acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in 120minutes (dosing rate of 2.3 g/min. The reactor was kept at 75° C. duringthe dosing period. After the acrylamide-dosing period the reactor washeated to 85° C. and the initiators were fed for another 120 minutes.Reaction product was cooled and stored at ambient temperature and solidswere found at 31.5%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2% solutionin 1 N NH₄Cl and found to be 0.28 dL/g.

Example 4

This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer inwhich a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 10 mole % DADMAC.

In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostatic bath,with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperature probe,nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected to fourdosing pumps 28 grams of DADMAC (65% solution, Aldrich) and 257 grams ofdemi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour. Initiators solutionof 2.6 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 67 grams of water and 0.3 gramsof SPDS in 67 grams of water were prepared. Both solutions were purgedfor 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 65° C. under gentlestirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 65° C. the initiatorfeed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.5 grams/minute, 426 gramsof acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in 120 minutes(dosing rate of 3.6 g/min) and 135.6 grams of DADMAC solution were dosedin 80 minutes (dosing rate of 0.7 g/min). The reactor was kept at 65° C.during the dosing period. After the dosing period the reactor was heatedto 80° C. and the initiators were fed for another 20 minutes. Reactionproduct was cooled and stored at ambient temperature and solids werefound at 33.4%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2% solution in 1 NNH₄Cl and found to be 0.29 dL/g.

Example 5

This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer inwhich a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 20 mole % DADMAC.

In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostatic bath,with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperature probe,nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected to fourdosing pumps. 50 grams of DADMAC (65% solution, Aldrich) and 291 gramsof demi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour. Initiatorssolution of 2.6 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 67 grams of water and0.3 grams of SPDS in 67 grams of water were prepared. Both solutionswere purged for 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 65° C. under gentlestirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 65° C. the initiatorfeed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.5 grams/minute, 340 gramsof acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in 120 minutes(dosing rate of 2.8 g/min) and 99 grams of DADMAC solution were dosed in80 minutes (dosing rate of 1.23 g/min). The reactor was kept at 65° C.during the dosing period. After the dosing period the reactor was heatedto 80° C. and the initiators were fed for another 20 minutes. Reactionproduct was cooled and stored at ambient temperature and solids werefound at 32.4%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2% solution in 1 NNH₄Cl and found to be 0.25 dL/g.

Example 6

This example describes preparation of a dialdehyde-reactive copolymer inwhich a cationic comonomer, DADMAC, and a comonomer which isdialdehyde-reactive, acrylamide, are reacted together and wherein theresultant copolymer comprises 40 mole % DADMAC.

In a jacketed one-liter glass reactor, connected to a thermostatic bath,with a five necked lid, equipped with a stirrer, temperature probe,nitrogen inlet plus cooler and two dosing points connected to fourdosing pumps 83 grams of DADMAC (65% solution, Aldrich) and 339 grams ofdemi water were purged with nitrogen for one hour. Initiators solutionof 2.6 grams of sodium metabisulfite in 67 grams of water and 0.3 gramsof SPDS in 67 grams of water were prepared. Both solutions were purgedfor 30 minutes with nitrogen prior to dosing.

After the nitrogen purge, the mixture was heated to 65° C. under gentlestirring. When the DADMAC/water mixture reached 65° C. the initiatorfeed pumps were started at a dosing rate of 0.4 grams/minute, 213 gramsof acrylamide solution (50% solution in water) were dosed in 120 minutes(dosing rate of 1.8 g/min) and 165 grams of DADMAC solution were dosedin 80 minutes (dosing rate of 2.1 g/min). The reactor was kept at 65° C.during the dosing period. After the dosing period the reactor was heatedto 80° C. and the initiators were fed for another 20 minutes. Reactionproduct was cooled and stored at ambient temperature and solids werefound at 33.1%. Reduced viscosity was determined of a 2% solution in 1 NNH₄Cl and found to be 0.22 dL/g.

Example 7

Resin obtained by glyoxalation of the copolymer from example 1 at 12%solids.

In a one liter glass beaker with a pH probe and magnetic stirrer bar,265.5 grams of a copolymer according to Example 1, 33.3 grams of glyoxal(total solids=40%, Aldrich) and 551.2 grams of demi water were mixed.The pH was adjusted to approx. 9.0 with 2.0 grams of a 10% causticsolution. After 20 minutes the pH was readjusted to 9.0 with 0.27 gramsof 10% caustic solution. The viscosity increase was monitored with aSpurlin Spence tube (1.47 mm bore). At a Spurlin-Spence viscosity of 80seconds, the reaction was terminated by a pH adjustment to pH 3 with0.80 grams of a 25% H₂SO₄ solution.

The total solids are 11.5%. Reduced viscosity was determined of 2%solution in 1 N NH₄Cl and found to be 0.69 dL/g.

Example 8

Resins obtained by glyoxalation of copolymers from examples 2-6 at 2%solids.

In procedures similar to procedures in Example 7, copolymers fromexamples 2-6 were reacted with glyoxal, in such a way that the amount ofglyoxal added was equal to 30% by weight of the acrylamide fraction inthe copolymer backbone. The resins produced had properties as in Table1.

TABLE 1 Characteristics of resins made according to Example 8 ReducedCharge Copolymer Total solids Residual free viscosity density Resincomposition (%) glyoxal (%) (dL/g) (meq/g) Resin 8A As in example 2 11.50.82 0.67 2.5 Resin 8B As in example 4 11.8 1.51 0.63 1.1 Resin 8C As inexample 5 11.4 1.02 0.74 1.9 Resin 8D As in example 6 11.7 0.42 0.69 3.1

Example 9

Resins obtained by glyoxalation of a copolymer similar to example 2 at15% and 19% solids.

A) In a 1000 mL glass beaker with a pH probe and magnetic stirrer bar,232 grams of a copolymer similar to Example 2, at 29.9% solids, 26.1grams of glyoxal (total solids=40%, Aldrich) and 241 grams of demi waterwere mixed. The pH was adjusted to approx. 9.2 with 1.1 grams of a 10%caustic solution. The viscosity increase was monitored with a SpurlinSpence tube (1.47 mm bore). At a Spurlin-Spence viscosity of 61 secondsthe reaction was terminated by a pH adjustment to pH 3 with 0.7 grams ofa 25% H₂SO₄ solution. The total solids are 15.3 Va. Reduced viscositywas determined of 2% solution in 1 N NH₄Cl and found to be 0.55 dL/g.

B) In a 1000 mL glass beaker with a pH probe and magnetic stirrer bar,261 grams of a copolymer similar to Example 2, at 29.9% solids, 29.4grams of glyoxal (total solids=40%, Aldrich) and 159 grams of demi waterwere mixed. The pH was adjusted to approx. 9.2 with 1.9 grams of a 10%caustic solution. The viscosity increase was monitored with a SpurlinSpence tube (1.47 mm bore). At a Spurlin-Spence viscosity of 61 secondsthe reaction was terminated by a pH adjustment to pH 3 with 0.7 grams ofa 25% H₂SO₄ solution. The total solids were 19.4%. Reduced viscosity wasdetermined of 2% solution in 1 N NH₄Cl and found to be 0.43 dL/g.

Example 10

Resins obtained by glyoxalation from the copolymer of Example 1 atdifferent glyoxal levels.

In procedures similar to Example 7, the copolymer from Example 1 wasreacted with 15, 30, 60 and 81% of glyoxal relative to the acrylamideweight fraction in the copolymer. The resins produced had properties asin Table 2.

TABLE 2 Characteristics of resins made according to Example 10 Amount ofReduced Copolymer glyoxal Total solids viscosity composition added (%)*(%) (dL/g) As in example 1 15 11.6 0.83 As in example 1 30 11.2 0.79 Asin example 1 60 11.7 0.63 As in example 1 81 11.5 0.62 *relative to theacrylamide weight fraction in the copolymer

Example 11

Resins obtained by glyoxalation of a copolymer similar to the copolymerfrom example 2 to different viscosities

In a procedure similar to the procedure outlined in example 7, resinsviscosities were allowed to increase to viscosities of 29, 44 and 72second Spurlin-Spence respectively. The product characteristics areshown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Characteristics of resins made according to Example 11 ReducedResidual Terminal viscosity Solids viscosity glyoxal Resin (s SpurlinSpence) (%) (dL/g) (%) Resin 11A 29 11.4 0.49 0.92 Resin 11B 44 11.50.67 0.82 Resin 11C 72 11.6 0.88 0.79

Example 12

This example describes the use of resins of the present invention inmaking paper useful in producing newsprint.

A papermaking furnish was prepared based on 90% thermo mechanical pulprefined to a Canadian Standard Freeness of 123 ml and 10% softwood Kraftpulp refined to refined to a Canadian Standard Freeness of 486 ml. Tothis suspension was added sulfite so that the concentration of thesulfite ion at the wire would be 100 ppm. To this suspension was alsoadded pectin as an anionic trash simulant so that the concentration ofthe pectin equaled 100 ppm. The pH of the papermaking suspension wascontrolled at 5 and paper was made at a basis weight of 30 lbs/ream.

A copolymer based on 80 mole % acrylamide and 20%diallyldimethylammonium chloride, similar to the copolymer prepared inExample 4, was reacted with glyoxal according to the procedure inExample 6 using 27% and 54% by weight of glyoxal relative to thecopolymer solids level to provide respectively resin A and resin B. Areference resin, comprising a glyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole %acrylamide and 5 mole % diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond®1000 resin, available from Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.) wasobtained.

The resins were added to papermaking slurry in such a way that the dryweight of the resin was 0.5% by weight of the dry fiber present in thepapermaking slurry. A typical commercial retention aid was added at adose level of 125 ppm. Paper was made on a small scale papermakingmachine and evaluated for Mullen burst strength, dry tensile strengthand wet strength after a soak of 1 minute in water (wet tensilestrength). The results for dry and wet tensile strengths were obtainedas geometric means of the individual strength in machine direction andcross direction. The results are expressed as a percentage of thestrength of untreated paper (blank) in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Paper properties of paper made according to example 12, withaddition of glyoxalated resin at a dose level of 0.5%, expressedrelative to the strength of untreated paper Dry tensile Mullen Burst Wettensile strength strength strength Resin (% blank) (% blank) (% blank)Reference resin 101 100 134 Resin A 105 112 183 Resin B 105 110 188

This example shows that whereas the reference resin provides hardly anybenefit for dry strength under the papermaking conditions applied,resins A and B, based on glyoxalated copolymers containing 20 mole %cationic comonomer, provide significant benefits for dry strength.Furthermore, resins A and B provide much more wet strength under thepapermaking conditions applied.

Example 13

This example demonstrates the effectiveness of resins of the presentinvention in hardwood/softwood furnish mixtures at different sulfitelevels.

A papermaking furnish was prepared based on 50%/50% bleachedhardwood/softwood mixture to a Schoppen Riegler Freeness of 33°. To thissuspension was added sulfite so that the concentration of the sulfiteion at the wire would be 0, 200 or 400 ppm. The pH of the papermakingsuspension was controlled between 5 and 5.4 and paper was made at abasis weight of 65 grams per square meter.

A copolymer based on 80 mole % acrylamide and 20%diallyldimethylammonium chloride, similar to the copolymer prepared inExample 5, was reacted with glyoxal according to the procedure inExample 7 using 28% by weight of glyoxal relative to the copolymersolids level to provide resin C. A reference resin, comprising aglyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole % acrylamide and 5 mole %diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond® 1000 resin, available fromHercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.) was obtained.

The resins were added to papermaking slurry in such a way that the dryweight of the resin was 0.3% by weight of the dry fiber present in thepapermaking slurry. Paper was made on a small scale papermaking machineand evaluated for Mullen burst strength, dry tensile strength Scott Bondinternal strength and wet strength after a soak of 2 hours in water (wettensile strength). The results for dry strength were obtained asgeometric means of the individual strength in machine direction andcross direction. The results are expressed as a percentage of thestrength of untreated paper (blank) in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Paper properties of paper made according to Example 13, withaddition of glyoxalated resin at a dose level of 0.3%, expressedrelative to the strength of untreated paper, at three different sulfitelevels. Sulfite Dry tensile Mullen Burst Scott Bond Wet tensile levelstrength strength internal strength strength (ppm) Resin (% blank) (%blank) (% blank) (% blank) 0 Reference resin 108 115 133 610 0 Resin C106 121 137 583 200 Reference resin 105 106 111 143 200 Resin C 108 116126 246 400 Reference resin 100 102 102 114 400 Resin C 102 112 112 169

This example shows that the performance of the reference resin decreaseswith increasing sulfite levels, to the point where virtually noadditional dry strength is provided at 400 ppm sulfite and that, in thepresence of sulfite, the resins described in this invention cansignificantly outperform the reference resin.

Example 14

This example demonstrates the effect of increasing levels of cationiccomonomer in resins of the present invention in hardwood/softwoodfurnish mixtures.

Papermaking in HW/SW furnish illustrating the effect of increasinglevels of cationic comonomer

A papermaking furnish was prepared based on 50%/50% bleachedhardwood/softwood mixture to a Schopper Riegler Freeness of 36°. To thissuspension was added sulfite so that the concentration of the sulfiteion at the wire would be 300 ppm. The pH of the papermaking suspensionwas controlled between 5 and 5.4 and paper was made at a basis weight of65 grams per square meter.

The resins of example 8 were used and a reference resin, comprising aglyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole % acrylamide and 5 mole %diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond® 1000 resin, available fromHercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.) was obtained.

The resins were added to the papermaking slurry in such a way that thedry weight of the resin was 0.3% by weight of the dry fiber present inthe papermaking slurry. Paper was made on a small scale papermakingmachine and evaluated for dry tensile strength Scott Bond internalstrength and wet strength after a soak of 10 seconds and 2 hours inwater (wet tensile strength). The results for dry strength were obtainedas geometric means of the individual strength in machine direction andcross direction. The results are expressed as a percentage of thestrength of paper treated with the reference resin in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Paper properties of paper made according to Example 14, withaddition of glyoxalated resin at a dose level of 0.3%, expressedrelative to the strength of paper treated with the reference resin,using resins based on glyoxalated copolymers containing different levelsof cationic comonomer. DADMAC level Dry tensile Scott Bond Wet tensileWet tensile in base strength internal strength strength (10 s) strength(2 h) copolymer (% ref. (% ref. (% ref. (% ref. Resin (mole %) paper)Paper) paper) Paper) Reference resin 5 100 100 100 100 Resin according10 103 99 98 111 to example 8 (B) Resin according 20 106 111 165 186 toexample 8 (C) Resin according 30 106 118 172 215 to example 7 Resinaccording 40 104 109 148 178 to example 8 (D)

This example shows that the performance of the reference resin increaseswith increasing amount of cationic comonomer, and that in thisparticular example there is an optimum at 30 mole % comonomer, and thatthe resins described in this invention significantly outperform thereference resin.

Example 15

This example demonstrates the effect of different solids levels ofresins of the present invention in hardwood/softwood furnish mixtures.

A papermaking furnish was prepared based on 50%/50% bleachedhardwood/softwood mixture to a Schoppen Riegler Freeness of 32°. To thissuspension was added sulfite so that the concentration of the sulfiteion at the wire would be 300 ppm. The pH of the papermaking suspensionwas controlled between 5 and 5.4 and paper was made at a basis weight of65 grams per square meter.

The resins of Example 9 were used and a reference resin, comprising areference resin, comprising a glyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole %acrylamide and 5 mole % diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond®1000 resin, available from Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.) wasobtained.

The resins were added to papermaking slurry in such a way that the dryweight of the resin was 0.3% by weight of the dry fiber present in thepapermaking slurry. Paper was made on a small scale papermaking machineand evaluated for dry tensile strength, Scott Bond internal strength,and wet tensile strength after a soak of 10 seconds in water. Theresults for dry strength were obtained as geometric means of theindividual strength in machine direction and cross direction. Theresults are expressed as a percentage of the strength of paper treatedwith the reference resin in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Paper properties of paper made according to Example 15, withaddition of glyoxalated resin at a dose level of 0.3%, expressedrelative to the strength of untreated paper, using resins based onglyoxalated copolymers at different solids levels. Solids Dry tensileScott Bond Wet tensile level strength internal strength strength (10 s)Resin (%) (% blank paper) (% blank paper) (% blank paper) Referenceresin 8 102 106 70 Resin according 12 105 118 180 to example 7 Resinaccording 15 104 120 170 to example 9A Resin according 19 103 113 140 toexample 9B

This example shows that the performance of the resins described in thisinvention significantly outperform the reference resin, even whenprepared at much higher solids levels.

Example 16

This example demonstrates the effect of papermaking in hardwood/softwoodfurnish mixtures at different terminal viscosities using resins of thepresent invention.

A papermaking furnish was prepared based on 50%/50% bleachedhardwood/softwood mixture to a Schopper Riegler Freeness of 32°. To thissuspension was added sulfite so that the concentration of the sulfiteion at the wire would be 300 ppm. The pH of the papermaking suspensionwas controlled between 5 and 5.4 and paper was made at a basis weight of65 grams per square meter.

The resins of Example 11 were used and a reference resin, comprising aglyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole % acrylamide and 5 mole %diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond® 1000 resin, available fromHercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.) was obtained.

The resins were added to papermaking slurry in such a way that the dryweight of the resin was 0.3% by weight of the dry fiber present in thepapermaking slurry. Paper was made on a small scale papermaking machineand evaluated for dry tensile strength, Scott Bond internal strength,and wet tensile strength after a soak of 10 seconds in water. Theresults for dry strength were obtained as geometric means of theindividual strength in machine direction and cross direction. Theresults are expressed as a percentage of the strength of paper treatedwith the reference resin in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Paper properties of paper made according to Example 16, withaddition of glyoxalated resin at a dose level of 0.3%, expressedrelative to the strength of untreated paper, using resins based onglyoxalated copolymers at different solids levels. Dry tensile ScottBond Wet tensile strength internal strength strength (10 s) Resin (%blank paper) (% blank paper) (% blank paper) Reference 101 106 70 resinResin 11A 104 126 210 Resin 11B 105 118 180 Resin 11C 106 126 230

This example shows that the performance of the resins described in thisinvention significantly outperform the reference resin, over a broadrange of viscosities.

Example 17

This example demonstrates the benefit of using resins of the presentinvention in making recycled liner board.

A fully dewatered recycled linerboard stock was diluted with water to a0.3% consistency and the pH was adjusted to 7. Drainage of this wastested using a Canadian Standard Freeness tester at dosages of 0, 1, 2,4 and 6 lbs/ton dry furnish.

The reference resin, was a glyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole % acrylamideand 5 mole % diallyldimethylammonium chloride (Hercobond® 1000 resin,available from Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.). The results aresummarized in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Drainage properties of resins made according to example 2, 3 and5 and a commercial reference resin in neutral recycled linerboardReference resin Resin Resin Resin (5 mole % DADMAC (10 mole % DADMAC (30mole % DADMAC (40 mole % DADMAC Dose in base copolymer) in basecopolymer) in base copolymer) in base copolymer) (lbs/ton) (mL) (mL)(mL) (mL) 0 474 474 474 474 1 497 530 549 578 2 517 577 611 627 4 558646 654 649 6 603 675 666 656

This example shows that the performance of the resins described in thisinvention significantly outperform the reference resin at any dose andthat the highest charged resins provides relatively more benefits atlower dosage.

Example 18

This example demonstrates the gelation stability of a resin according toExample 2 relative to a typical commercial resin formulation.

A resin according to Example 2 at 12% solids and a reference resin(Hercobond® 1000 resin, available from Hercules Incorporated,Wilmington, Del.), comprising a glyoxalated copolymer of 95 mole %acrylamide and 5 mole % diallyldimethylammonium chloride obtained at 8%solids, were stored at 25 and 32° C. and the viscosity of the solutionswas monitored using a Brookfield LVDVII+ device using spindle 1. Theresults are shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 1, demonstrates that the reactive cationic resins of the presentinvention, exhibit better stability against gelation than the referenceresin, even though the reactive cationic resin of the present inventionwere tested at higher solids levels. For the purposes of illustration,gelled resins are given a viscosity of 100 cP. Actual values for gelledresins would be greater than 100 cP

It is not intended that the examples presented here should be construedto limit the invention, but rather they are submitted to illustrate someof the specific embodiments of the invention. Various modifications andvariations of the present invention can be made without departing fromthe scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A process for improving drainage in paper makingcomprising the steps of: a. forming an aqueous suspension of cellulosicfibers, b. adding an effective amount of a cationic resin to the aqueoussuspension of cellulosic fibers, c. forming the cellulosic fibers into asheet, and d. drying the sheet to produce a paper, wherein theimprovement to drainage is provided by the cationic resin of step b);wherein the cationic resin of step b) comprises the reaction product ofa dialdehyde with a copolymer produced from acrylamide, anddiallyldimethylammonium chloride, and wherein thediallyldimethylammonium chloride comprises greater than or equal toabout 30 mole % of the copolymer before reaction with the dialdehyde. 2.The process of claim 1 wherein the diallyldimethylammonium chloridecomprises greater than or equal to about 40 mole % of the copolymerbefore reaction with dialdehyde.
 3. The process of claim 1 wherein thedialdehyde comprises glyoxal.
 4. The process of claim 1 wherein thedialdehyde comprises glyoxal and wherein diallyldimethylammoniumchloride comprises greater than or equal to 30 mole % of the copolymerbefore reaction with dialdehyde.
 5. The process of claim 1, wherein thecationic resin has a charge density of greater than 1.0 meq/g.
 6. Theprocess of claim 5, wherein the cationic resin has a charge density ofgreater than 1.5 meq/g.
 7. The process of claim 6, wherein the cationicresin has a charge density of greater than 2.5 meq/g.
 8. A process forimproving drainage in paper making comprising the steps of: a. formingan aqueous suspension of cellulosic fibers, b. adding an effectiveamount of a cationic resin to the aqueous suspension of cellulosicfibers, and c. forming the cellulosic fibers into a sheet, wherein theimprovement to drainage is provided by the cationic resin of step b);wherein the cationic resin of step b) comprises the reaction product ofa dialdehyde with a copolymer produced from acrylamide, anddiallyldimethylammonium chloride, and wherein thediallyldimethylammonium chloride comprises greater than or equal toabout 30 mole % of the copolymer before reaction with the dialdehyde. 9.The process of claim 8 wherein the diallyldimethylammonium chloridecomprises greater than or equal to about 40 mole % of the copolymerbefore reaction with dialdehyde.
 10. The process of claim 8 wherein thedialdehyde comprises glyoxal.
 11. The process of claim 8 wherein thedialdehyde comprises glyoxal and wherein diallyldimethylammoniumchloride comprises greater than or equal to 30 mole % of the copolymerbefore reaction with dialdehyde.
 12. The process of claim 8, wherein thecationic resin has a charge density of greater than 1.0 meq/g.
 13. Theprocess of claim 12, wherein the cationic resin has a charge density ofgreater than 1.5 meq/g.
 14. The process of claim 13, wherein thecationic resin has a charge density of greater than 2.5 meq/g.